Archive for January, 2012

More dumb spec

Posted in Uncategorized on January 31, 2012 by Anonymous

So guess what the spec is writing on now… this is the quote I have from the article:

The Institute will also award competitive “Magic Grants” to fund the most creative and feasible models or prototypes presented by any student at either university.

How stupid!



Stupid spec video

Posted in Uncategorized on January 31, 2012 by Anonymous

So the spec decided to make a STUPID video.  But mine is so much better because I can’t hear them!  You can check out my super cool video (and I will keep you posted for more videos on why the spec sucks and how we are fighting against the stupidest news paper ever called the spec.

Memes over content

Posted in Uncategorized on January 28, 2012 by Anonymous

So spectator thinks they can make another stupid article without me noticing.  Check out the super-terrible article Memes over Matter.

First lets start with the obivous:  what is that picture? well first off really stupid, but then I see it is just a stupid sketch by the Spec (why don’t you learn to draw real people?)

Then it is still bad (this is a direct quote):

For example, a series of intricate cave paintings in Lascaux, France, estimated to be over 17,000 years old, may depict dreams, visions, and instructions on ancient hunting practices.

Oh really, spec, they may have depicted dreams, visions, and instructions on ancient hunting practices?  Did you go ask the people who drew them?  Oh, no?  Well then did you read their biographies of the people who drew them? oh yeah thats right they have been  dead for a million years and they didn’t write anything.  So you’re telling me they basically pulled this idea out of their ass.  Well, I guess that makes alot of sense, considering spec pulls most of its content OUT OF ITS ASS.

Books like I SPY and Can You See What I See help children to associate images with words before they learn to read.

Oh this is great.  Why dont you tell me about more childrens books spec? thats exactly what I want to learn about.

And then you get this quote:

Matthew Carroll discusses the effects of these heavily pictorial websites, arguing that they “incentivize the prolific creation of low-investment, transient content dominated by ‘dumb images.’”

So great, basically just quote some meaningless technobabble, because you’re too lazy to come up with content, so you just use someone else’s quote to cover up the fact that you have nothing to say.

“Like” buttons and “repinning” don’t encourage the linguistic response that pictures should provoke.

Oh, I guess you do have some time to insert some purposely obfuscating language of your own. (OMG I guess I can do it too, spec.  Don’t think it makes you look smart).

But the stupidness of every sentence is not as much as the stupidness of the whole article. The spectator is claiming that there is a “Image Intelligence Problem”, but that is so obviously wrong because what about BLIND PEOPLE?  Does that mean all blind people are STUPID?  Oh yeah, did you forget that BLIND PEOPLE GO TO COLUMBIA??  do you think they might be even a little bit smart?  well then your whole article is obviously wrong.

Spectator is hipster

Posted in Uncategorized on January 28, 2012 by Anonymous

Hello fellow spect-haters.

As you know the spectator is run by hipsters.  And their latest article is like a hipster party:

And to to top it off, they were too busy being hipster to even mention the brooklyn museum!  (Thanks to Jason for pointing that out)  Spec is not only very bad it is incompetent.

The Dark Cloak

Posted in Uncategorized on January 26, 2012 by Anonymous

Some may be asking about the identity of The Dark Cloak (among the other psuedonims he goes under).  I cannot confirm or deny his identity, but I can only say that he is a very mysterious man, and that his identity will only be revealed when the time is right.   He is like the Zorro of the Blogosphere, and he will bring justice where it is deserved.


Ps by the way the RIPOFF blog which is attacking me, I KNOW WHO YOU ARE.  I told you i have ALL THE INSIDE SOURCES.  I know you are from the SPEC.  And by the way, it is spelled Mayweather, IDIOT, and he would kick your ass if he saw you write his name that way.  And you are also stupid, because I only said Mayweather as an EXAMPLE that was not my point to try and get them to bring Mayweather to columbia!  Wow you are so stupid, but that makes sense, because you are from the SPEC which is STUPID.

Spec is lame

Posted in Uncategorized on January 24, 2012 by Anonymous

The Spec is the lamest newspaper ever. They are really bad and nobody likes them.  If you like spec then that is not true because nobody likes spec.  You better watch out spec, because I have all the inside information, and I will take you down.  Spect-haters, unite!

Spec has no original content

Posted in Uncategorized on January 24, 2012 by Anonymous

Well guess which article the spec just totally ripped off!!  The website!  Instead of doing something original they just are like “here’s a website”.  Why weren’t they just like “here’s a website”  and linked us to I don’t need you giving me another website SPEC.  You are a news paper, not google.   And did you notice that they stole their picture?  Yeah, you might have noticed that it says “Image Via Wikimedia Commons”, but do you know what that’s code for?  They stole it from wikipedia!  Now everyone knows they are stupid.