Questionable Content found in the Spec

I have often heard the phrase “questionable content”, and wondered the meaning (and even moreso the intent) behind it.  It seems to be very ambiguous as to who is doing the questioning, and what sort of questioning is being done.  For example, I am questioning the terribleness of the spec.  I am questioning whether they have content or are just a dumb news paper.  So does that mean spec has questionable content?  I think it does.  I will never stop questioning them no matter how many times they answer with lies.  There is no escape from the iron grasp of specsucks.  Once you suck, you never go back.  And spectator: the only place you are going back to is HELL.

Advertisements

Write a comment to show how the spec sucks.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: