Deeper Investigation of the spec UNDERBELLY

according to official documents which we got our hands on, the spectator is claiming to the U.S. Government that

SPECTATOR PUBLISHING CO. INC. IS A STUDENT-RUN ORGANIZATION, WITH AN
INDEPENDENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS, RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PUBLICATION OF
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S DAILY NEWSPAPER, THE COLUMBIA DAILY SPECTATOR.
THE OBJECTIVE OF THE ORGANIZATION IS TO PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH AN
OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN ALL FACETS OF THE NEWSPAPER PRODUCTION BUSINESS.
… IN RETURN FOR THE FREE CIRCULATION, THE UNIVERSITY PROVIDES
OFFICE AND PRODUCTION SPACE TO THE ORGANIZATION.

There are lots of things which are sketchy about this:

Note my point of contention, that the spec is indeed  not separate from columbia university, notice how the spec uses WEASEL words to avoid commiting perjury.  They say that it is “WITH AN INDEPENDENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS”, but they do not say that it is INDEPENDENT with a board of directors there is a difference.  THEY ARE WITH A BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHICH IT IS INDEPENDENT BUT THE SPEC ITSELF IS NOT.   Then of course they also give another hint taht they are “RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PUBLICATION OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S DAILY NEWSPAPER” which is PROOF that the spec is not independent because they do not say “oh we publish for this community or whatever bullshit they put on there web site but they say they are for COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S DAILY PAPER AS IT IS BELONG TO THE UNIVERSITY NOT SPEC.

Then we get to the biggest lie that “THE OBJECTIVE OF THE ORGANIZATION IS TO PROVIDE STUDENTS WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN ALL FACETS OF THE NEWSPAPER PRODUCTION BUSINESS.” WHAT A LOAD OF HOG WASH.  First of all if you are a news paper then shouldnt your OBJECTIVE be provide news for the columbia university on a piece of paper, not to provide opportunity to learn about FACETS (WHAT THE FUCK IS A FACET ANYWAY).  Second of all they use vogue language like “NEWSPAPER PRODUCTION BUSINESS” to hide to have to say what they are saying.  “NEWS PAPER PRODUCTION BUSINESS” is quite clear that it covers historically CORRUPTION like the dreyfus affair and water gate and NEWS CORP HACKING CELL PHONES.  SO THIS COULD MEAN ANY THING.  AND THIRD OF ALL HOW CAN SPEC CLAIM TO BE OBJECTIVE ALL THEY DO IS BIAS

Then the spec tries to deny that they are getting paid for sitting on their fat asses. they say that columbia is paying them in return for “free circulation”, but wait do not be fooled it is free circulation of WHAT?  it is free circulation of the SPEC.  Do you get that?!?!?  the SPEC is being payed for free circulation of the SPEC.  That is like paying ME for free circulation of MYSELF for WALKING TO CLASS EVERY DAY.  IT IS YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY TO MOVE YOURSELF AROUND SPEC DONT TRY TO CLAIM THAT YOU DESERVE MONEY FOR IT.  And then they also say that the university is “PROVIDES OFFICE AND PRODUCTION SPACE TO THE ORGANIZATION” well that sounds to me like their assets are FUNGIBLE so if you do not charge me for this then that is like YOU PAYED ME MONEY so it does not matter how they are funneling the money the spec is still sucking off the teet of the university WHICH I PAYED MONEY TO AND I WANT EVERY PENNY WHICH WENT TO SPEC BACK.  PREZBO IF YOU ARE READING THIS THEN GIVE ME MY MONEY BACK.

WATCH OUT SPEC. WE ARE REACHING the DARK HAND up inside of you and GROPING AROUND.

Advertisements

Write a comment to show how the spec sucks.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: